Data Warehouse Modernization for AI-Ready Data, Delivered on a Fixed Date
- Agent-readable schema
- Lineage to source
- Freshness targets
- Date in the SOW
- AWS Premier Tier
Your AI roadmap probably assumes a warehouse that can answer an agent correctly, show where the answer came from and say how current it is. Most legacy warehouses manage none of that without a person checking. Mactores rebuilds the warehouse on AWS against a completion date fixed in the SOW and a fee settled before build, with agents doing most of the groundwork, so your data is fit for agents before the first one goes live. If the delay is ours, the cost is too.
Agents on the roadmap?
Learn what your warehouse would need to support them, before a pilot shows you the hard way.
A short call covers what an agent needs from your data and how long it takes to get there.
- AWS Partner Network
- Premier Tier
- AWS Specialization
- Agentic AI
- Consulting Competencies
- 7 Competencies
- Service Validations
- 17 Validations
60–70%
share of engagement effort carried by agents, not billable analysts
12 wks
median time to production, measured over every Mactores engagement
21
case studies published under real customer names
200+
AWS-certified FDEs
2008
when Mactores began delivering production work on AWS
Top Mactores Clients
On this page Close Open
An analyst who spots an odd number in a dashboard pauses and asks around. An agent does not. It queries, treats the result as fact and acts on it: it files a forecast, flags a transaction or answers a customer. That raises the bar for the warehouse underneath. Columns need business meaning, every figure needs a traceable origin, freshness needs a published target, and permissions have to follow an agent the way they follow an employee. Mactores modernizes the warehouse to that bar, with one team of FDEs from the first inventory to the final decommission.
- Readable by machines
Tables and columns carry documented business definitions, so an agent picks the right field instead of the closest-sounding one.
- Traceable to source
Any metric an agent cites can be followed back through its transformations to the system that produced it.
- Fresh by commitment
Each data product ships with a stated refresh target and monitoring, so stale data is caught before an agent repeats it.
- Dated and priced upfront
The completion date and the fee sit in the SOW, and any overrun we cause is ours to fund.
Scoping, not guesswork
Leave scoping knowing your completion date, your fee and the first agent use case the warehouse will serve.
Scoping turns an AI ambition into a warehouse plan with numbers attached.
Why Does a Data Warehouse Need Modernizing Before You Deploy AI Agents?
Because agents amplify whatever the warehouse already gets wrong. Gartner expects organizations to drop six in ten AI projects through 2026 when the data behind them is not AI-ready, and it found that 63% of organizations either lack the data management disciplines AI requires or cannot tell whether they have them. A later Gartner survey of 353 data, analytics and AI leaders tied the most mature AI-ready data capabilities to as much as 65% better business outcomes.
Source discovery, schema mapping, lineage extraction, data-quality and reconciliation tests
Target architecture, business definitions, the access model for agents, cutover sequence and sign-offs
The terms in full
Read who pays when a modernization date slips.
The commitment page sets out the clause before any scoping conversation starts.
What Does AI-Ready Data Warehouse Modernization Include?
The work covers the warehouse itself and the layer an agent will touch. Typical starting points are Teradata, Netezza, Oracle, SQL Server, on-premises Hadoop and ageing Redshift clusters. The AWS target is chosen from the workload: usually Amazon Redshift, sometimes an Amazon S3 lakehouse on Apache Iceberg tables, often both.
-
01
Inventory and profiling of sources, schemas, transformation code, pipelines, consumers and data-quality defects, so scope and fee rest on evidence
-
02
Target architecture on AWS: Amazon Redshift for governed analytics, Amazon S3 with Apache Iceberg where open formats or lakehouse access matter, and AWS Glue for pipelines
-
03
A semantic and metadata layer: business definitions on tables and columns, a governed catalog with lineage in Amazon SageMaker Catalog, and a freshness target for each data product
-
04
Agent access designed in: individual agent identities, row- and column-level security, query guardrails, and tested interfaces such as Amazon Bedrock Knowledge Bases structured retrieval or the open-source Amazon Redshift MCP server
-
05
Parallel-run reconciliation, a staged cutover, and retirement of the legacy warehouse with its licences and hardware
Looking for Redshift migration mechanics, such as Teradata script conversion, distribution keys, or RG versus Serverless? Those sit on our AWS Redshift migration consulting page. This page is about the end state an AI program needs, and it belongs to the wider Data Platform Modernization practice.
Where are you starting?
Tell us the warehouse you run today and the first agent you want to point at it.
The source platform sets the migration route; the agent use case defines what "ready" has to mean.
What Are the Phases of Modernizing a Legacy Data Warehouse for AI?
-
01
Evidence-based scoping
Agents inventory the warehouse, read its query history and profile its data to show which tables matter, which transformations change business meaning and where quality breaks. FDEs pair that evidence with the first two or three agent use cases you plan, so "AI-ready" is defined against real questions rather than a checklist. The SOW then fixes scope, completion date and fee.Phase exit
SOW signed with scope, date, fee and the agent use cases the warehouse must serve.
-
02
Rebuild and describe
The target is built on AWS, data is loaded and kept in step with the source, and pipelines are rebuilt or re-pointed. As each table lands, it gets a business definition, an owner, a freshness target and lineage back to source, all recorded in the catalog instead of in someone's memory. Your data owners approve each definition before this phase ends.Phase exit
Definitions, lineage and freshness targets approved by your data owners.
-
03
Reconcile and switch
The old and new warehouses process the same loads side by side, and reconciliation checks counts, totals and key report outputs until they agree. Cutover then moves consumers in planned groups, with reports first and agents last, and rollback conditions are settled in advance.Phase exit
Both warehouses reconcile; rollback conditions signed off.
-
04
Agent readiness and retirement
Before any agent goes live, its access is tested: the right rows and columns, sensible query limits, and answers compared with known results for your use cases. Performance is tuned against real usage, and the legacy warehouse is switched off, licence and hardware included, which is the step that frees money for whatever comes next.Phase exit
Agent access tested against your use cases; legacy warehouse approved for decommissioning.
What Phase 1 hands you
A signed scope, a completion date and a fee, tied to the agents you plan to run.
Build doesn't start until every part of it is in writing.
What Have Mactores' Data Modernization Projects Delivered?
These are four engagements with named customers and public write-ups. They cover data lakes, a pricing platform and factory data rather than a single warehouse product, and each shows something an AI-ready warehouse needs.
-
Financial Services · Real-time data
100%
Pricing integrity maintained through the switch
3
Regulatory expectations built in: SEC, FINRA, FFIEC
Traceable model decisions at a Fortune 500 insurer
Overnight batches set the insurer's mortgage-backed securities prices, and earlier attempts to go real-time collapsed under the cost of proving each price to auditors after the fact. Mactores made traceability a property of the platform: every input, model invocation and trade is logged the moment it occurs. That is precisely what an AI-ready warehouse needs, since anything a model or agent produces can be tied back to its inputs. Pricing integrity measured 100% across the cutover.
Read the case study → -
Manufacturing · Operational data lake
40%
Higher throughput on a major EDA cluster
75%
Less time jobs spent queued
An AI-backed data lake that ended queue contention (Synaptics)
Engineering jobs at Synaptics were stuck behind one another on legacy infrastructure. Mactores designed an AWS-based operational data lake with intelligent queuing and had it running in production within weeks. Queues shrank by three-quarters and throughput climbed 40%, and that capacity went back into chip design instead of waiting.
Read the case study → -
Manufacturing · Unified operations data
1
Command center replacing manual correlation across factory systems
Zero
Line disruption at cutover
One real-time view across MES, PLC and sensor data (HP)
Factory data at HP was split across manufacturing execution systems, PLCs, quality sensors, ERP and logistics tools, and operators stitched it together by hand. Earlier attempts stalled because integration alone would have used up the budget. Mactores automated the discovery and unification work, lineage included, then built a real-time operations command center on AWS and timed the cutover so production never stopped.
Read the case study → -
Internet & Software · Data foundation
Weeks
To move off a Hadoop-backed database
Up
Engagement, credited to the migration
A sturdier foundation that lifted engagement (Flipboard)
Flipboard's Hadoop-era database was struggling as engagement grew. Mactores rebuilt the foundation on AWS in weeks, and the team put its effort into improvements rather than like-for-like copying. Flipboard's VP of Engineering, Greg Scallan, credits the migration with better resilience and higher user engagement.
Read the case study →
None of these was a warehouse-only project, and we don't present them as one. Together they show the habits an AI-ready warehouse depends on: traceability built in, integration automated, and cutovers planned around the people and processes that can't stop. Complete write-ups are on mactores.com/stories.
References
Want to speak with a customer whose starting point matches yours?
We arrange reference conversations, and detailed figures are available under NDA when we reach contract stage.
How Can You Audit What an AI Agent Pulled From Your Data Warehouse?
Once an agent's output reaches a regulator, a patient record or a financial statement, the real question is who can prove what the agent saw. A modernized warehouse answers with three records: lineage from source to column, query logs showing exactly what each agent identity retrieved, and signed acceptance evidence from every phase of the migration.
That PHI access, by people or agents, is limited to the minimum necessary and logged
That cardholder data in analytics is masked, tokenized or excluded, and never surfaced through an agent
Agents get their own identities in the warehouse, never a shared service login, so every query they run is attributable in the query history. For banks reporting under the BCBS 239 principles, the same lineage record doubles as evidence that risk data can be traced from source to report.
Audit scope
Share what your auditors asked for last cycle. We'll show where the answers will live.
Each framework maps to an artifact and a phase exit before build begins.
What Should Each Industry Prioritize When Modernizing a Data Warehouse for AI?
The contract is identical across sectors; the first use case and the first risk are not.
Financial Services
Start where agents will touch regulated numbers: finance, risk and regulatory reporting marts. Definitions are agreed with finance and compliance before any agent reads them, and lineage runs back to general ledger and core banking sources.
Explore Financial services →Healthcare & Life Sciences
Start with the access model. Claims, clinical and research data get column-level controls and de-identified views, so an agent sees only what its task requires, and every PHI query is logged.
Explore Healthcare →Internet & Software
Start with product and customer data an agent can act on, such as churn signals or usage anomalies. Parallel runs are scheduled around your release calendar, and zero-ETL integrations with Amazon Aurora, Amazon RDS or DynamoDB can retire brittle nightly jobs.
Explore Internet & Software →Manufacturing
Start with the data operations already trusts: MES, quality and maintenance records. OT and SCADA-adjacent feeds are profiled early, and plant leadership signs off cutover windows with the reconciliation results in hand.
Explore Manufacturing →Telco, Media, Entertainment, Gaming, and Sports (TMEGS)
Start with freshness. Audience and event data lose value within minutes, so streaming ingestion is sized for peak nights, and no cutover is scheduled near a launch or live event.
Explore TMEGS →The delivery model stays the same in every vertical. What changes is emphasis: governance for regulated data, continuity for operational systems, speed for product-led teams.
Start with your sector
Tell us the first agent you want in production. We'll scope backwards from it.
Forecasting, fraud flags, clinical summaries, maintenance alerts or audience insights.
What Does Data Warehouse Modernization Cost, and Who Carries the Overrun Risk?
About these numbers
This section explains how the fee is built. It is not a quote, and any figures here are directional. Your fixed fee is confirmed in the signed SOW once scoping ends.
Terabytes are a weak predictor. A small warehouse carrying years of undocumented business logic usually costs more to make AI-ready than a large, clean one. From signature onward, Mactores pays for delays it causes. Delays that originate with the customer, such as late access, pending decisions or scope changes, move to the time-and-materials terms spelled out in the SOW.
How can an existing IT budget pay for AI-ready data?
Look at what the legacy warehouse costs just to stand still. Licence and support renew every year, appliance hardware ages toward replacement, batch capacity is sized for peaks that arrive a few days a month, and a stored-procedure layer eats specialist time simply to stay running. Retiring those lines is how most programs pay for the move. Qualifying workloads may also receive AWS Migration Acceleration Program (MAP) funding; eligibility is AWS's call, and we assess it in Phase 1.
What the legacy warehouse costs today
- Licence and support renewals
- Hardware nearing replacement
- Batch capacity sized for occasional peaks
- Specialist hours keeping old procedures alive
What that budget funds next
- Modernization, definitions and lineage
- Agent access design and testing
- The first production agent use case
One honest caveat: savings arrive when the old system is switched off, not when the new one goes live. Plans that keep both running "for safety" pay twice. That is why decommissioning is a phase with its own exit criteria rather than an afterthought.
Your numbers
Bring the renewal notice and the AI business case. We'll put a fixed fee against both.
A 30-minute working session led by the FDE who would scope your warehouse.
What Is AI-Ready Data? Key Data Warehouse Modernization Terms
Working definitions for the terms used across this page.
- AI-ready data
- Data an AI system can use without a person double-checking it: documented in business terms, traceable to source, validated against known results, refreshed on a stated schedule, and governed by access rules that apply to agents just as they apply to people.
- Agent-native
- Mactores' operating model, in which agents do most engagement work by design. It is the structural reason fixed-fee, fixed-date delivery holds up commercially.
- Forward-deployed engineer (FDE)
- A Mactores specialist who works inside your team, makes the architecture and cutover calls, and answers personally for the delivery date. FDEs have shipped agentic AI systems to production on AWS.
- Semantic layer
- Business definitions, such as what "active customer" or "net revenue" means, attached to warehouse tables and metrics so agents and people interpret them identically.
- Data lineage
- The recorded path a value takes from its source system through each transformation to wherever it is used.
- Freshness target
The maximum acceptable age of data in a table or data product, monitored so breaches are flagged before anyone relies on stale results.
- Data product
- A curated, owned and documented dataset built for a defined set of consumers, agents included.
- Lakehouse
- An architecture that keeps data in open table formats such as Apache Iceberg on Amazon S3 while supporting warehouse-style SQL and governance.
- Model Context Protocol (MCP)
- An open standard that lets AI agents discover and call tools and data sources through one consistent interface. AWS publishes an open-source MCP server for Amazon Redshift.
- Row- and column-level security
- Warehouse controls that restrict which records and fields a given user or agent identity can see.
- Parallel run
- Operating the legacy and modernized warehouses side by side on the same data until their results reconcile.
- Staged cutover
- Moving consumers to the new warehouse in planned groups with rollback conditions, instead of all at once.
- Fixed-date, fixed-fee
- Commercial terms that set the completion date and total price in the SOW, with Mactores funding any delay it causes.
- Legacy retirement
- Decommissioning the old warehouse, along with its licences, support and hardware, once the new one is proven.
Contract language
The fixed-date clause, word for word.
See exactly what Mactores owes you if the date moves.
Which AWS Credentials Should a Data Warehouse Modernization Partner Have?
Prioritize credentials that AWS audits itself, since they are checked against delivered work instead of self-reported. On that measure, Mactores holds Premier Tier status in the AWS Partner Network, the top level for services firms, and its specializations include Agentic AI, alongside a Generative AI Services Competency.
Among its seven consulting competencies, three bear directly on warehouse work: Data and Analytics, Machine Learning, and Migration and Modernization. Seven of its 17 AWS Service Validations map to the services a modernization runs on: Amazon Redshift, AWS Glue, AWS Database Migration Service, Amazon EMR, Amazon Kinesis, Amazon MSK and Amazon QuickSight.
Mactores has delivered on AWS since 2008. You can confirm every credential above in AWS's partner directory without having to take our word for it.
- Agentic AI
- Agentic AI Specialization
- Partner tier
- Premier Tier Services Partner
- Key validation for this work
- Amazon Redshift Delivery
- Validations
- 17 AWS Service Validations
- Team
- 200+ AWS-certified FDEs
- On AWS
- Since 2008
The Agentic AI Specialization is named in words because we hold the credential and not the badge artwork. We would rather name a credential you can verify than display a mark we cannot source. Full detail is on the partners page.
Verify independently
Check the tier, competencies and validations in AWS's own directory.
Search for Mactores in AWS Partner Solutions Finder, or begin with the partners section of our site.
What Do Teams Ask Most About Modernizing a Data Warehouse for AI?
What is data warehouse modernization?
What makes a data warehouse ready for AI agents?
Should we modernize the warehouse before building AI agents?
How long does data warehouse modernization take?
Who pays if a modernization project runs late?
What if our legacy warehouse is messier than expected?
Should we choose Amazon Redshift or a lakehouse on Amazon S3?
How will AI agents query the modernized warehouse?
Do you replace Snowflake or Databricks?
How do you keep AI agent access compliant with HIPAA or SOX?
What separates this from how traditional data consultancies work?
What happens to the legacy warehouse afterward?
What information should we prepare for scoping?
Ask the FDE
Have a question specific to your warehouse? Ask the person who would answer for the date.
Thirty minutes, your questions, no sales deck.
Point Us at the Warehouse Your First AI Agent Will Depend On
-
01
Share your current platform, rough size, first agent use case and deadline. No RFP required.
-
02
Once fit is confirmed, you get a session with the FDE accountable for your delivery date.
-
03
A scoped proposal, fixed date and fixed fee included, follows within five business days.