AI Agent Development Services: From Pilot to Production on AWS

  • AI Agent Development
  • Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
  • Agentic AI on AWS

Mactores' AI agent development services design, build, and ship agents into your live systems on AWS, on a production date written into the SOW, for a fee fixed before the build starts.

Agents reach production when someone owns the hard parts: permissions, evaluation, integration, and the go-live sign-off. Mactores puts that ownership in the contract. Agents carry the repetitive engineering. Mactores FDEs sit inside your team and carry the judgment calls through cutover. Once you sign acceptance, the agent belongs to your operations team.

Get a production date for your agent

Bring one workflow. Leave with a go or no-go, a scope, and a date.

A working session with Mactores FDEs.

Book a working session
AWS Premier Tier Services Partner badge
AWS Partner Network
Premier Tier
AWS Specialization
Agentic AI
Competencies incl. Generative AI
7 Competencies
AWS-certified practitioners
200+

60 to 70%

approximate share of engagement hours agents absorb versus a traditional proposal of equivalent scope

12 weeks

from kickoff to KlearTrust's production HIPAA claims platform

21+

public case studies

200+

AWS-certified practitioners on the Mactores team

2008

shipping on AWS since

Top Mactores Clients

All 21 case studies →
Customers include Safaricom, Synaptics, Flipboard, Poshmark, Seagate, HP, Adani, DocuSign, KlearTrust, Tilia, Sterne Kessler and Total Expert.

Why Do AI Agent Pilots Stall Before Production?

AI agent pilots stall because a pilot and a production agent are different jobs. A pilot answers questions in a sandbox. A production agent writes to your ERP, touches regulated data, and has to behave when a user tries something nobody scripted. Most pilot budgets fund the first job and none of the second.

The agent then waits in a demo environment while the board asks when it will ship. The market numbers show how common that is.

17%

of organizations have deployed AI agents so far, according to the 2026 Gartner CIO and Technology Executive Survey. More than 60% expect to within two years.

40%

of organizations with at least $1 billion in revenue now scale AI agents in one or more functions, up from 27%, according to McKinsey's The State of AI in 2026. Smaller organizations stayed flat at 22%.

The pattern is familiar from the pilots we are asked to rescue. Before KlearTrust came to Mactores, two of its automation pilots had stalled at the handoff from strategy to build, because PHI handling and audit requirements outgrew the team staffed to deliver them. The table maps the symptoms we look for to their usual causes.

What you see
Usual cause
What Mactores changes
Great demo, weak results on live traffic
Usual cause: Test set built from easy cases
What Mactores changes: A golden dataset drawn from real tickets, claims, or transactions
Security review keeps sending it back
Usual cause: Agent runs on broad service credentials
What Mactores changes: Least-privilege identity and scoped access per tool
Each new system becomes a new integration project
Usual cause: Tools wired by hand for one pilot
What Mactores changes: Tools exposed once through AgentCore Gateway and MCP, under one permission model
Costs climb faster than usage
Usual cause: No token or latency budget per task
What Mactores changes: Model routing, caching, and a cost ceiling per completed task
Nobody will sign the go-live
Usual cause: No owner for wrong actions
What Mactores changes: Approval thresholds tied to action risk, and a named operational owner
Accuracy drifts after launch
Usual cause: Changes ship without regression tests
What Mactores changes: Evaluation suites that run before every release

Pilot stuck in a sandbox?

We review what blocks go-live, keep what works, and commit to a production date.

Bring the pilot you have, and the reason it has not shipped.

Get a pilot review

How Does Fixed-Date, Fixed-Fee Enterprise AI Agent Development Work?

Enterprise AI agent development at Mactores runs on agent-native delivery. About two-thirds of engagement hours go to agents, which take the repetitive build, test, and tracing work. FDEs own every decision that carries risk. That split is what lets Mactores fix the scope, the fee, and the production date in the SOW before the build starts.

Agents absorb the scale

  • Agent orchestration
  • Evaluation harness and test generation
  • Retrieval pipelines
  • Observability and tracing

FDEs own the judgment

  • What the agent is allowed to do on its own
  • Human approval thresholds
  • Model selection and data preparation
  • Integration design
  • Production cutover

The commercial terms follow from that split. Scope, fee, and production date are fixed in the SOW once assessment closes. If a delay is ours, we absorb the overage. Delays caused by customer dependencies convert to time and materials at a rate disclosed in the SOW. A 90-day warranty then covers production defects after acceptance, at no charge to you. Across Mactores engagements, 94% have been delivered on or ahead of the committed date.

The handover is planned on day one, and for good reason. Gartner predicts that 70% of enterprises will abandon agentic AI built by vendor forward-deployed engineering by 2028, largely because internal teams can't maintain those systems once the vendor's people leave. Mactores designs against that outcome. FDEs pair with your domain experts and platform team from the first sprint, every phase closes with a signed exit, and runbooks and architecture decision records ship with the agent. Your team runs it after go-live, which is where the knowledge of how it works needs to live.

The delivery model in full

See how agents and FDEs split the work, phase by phase.

The same model runs every Mactores engagement.

See how we work

What Do Mactores' AI Agent Development Services Include?

Mactores' AI agent development services cover six entry points: agent readiness assessment, custom AI agent development, pilot-to-production rescue, SaaS app-to-agent conversion, governance and compliance engineering, and run-and-optimize support. Whether your team calls it AI agent development or agentic AI development services, each engagement is scoped to one business workflow and one production date.

This page covers the build side of AI Agents for Apps, one of the three Mactores delivery pillars. Pick the entry point that matches where you are today.

Service
What you get
Best fit when
Agent readiness assessment
What you get: Use cases ranked by value, risk, and data availability, with a go or no-go per workflow
Best fit when: You have a list of ideas and no clear first bet
Custom AI agent development
What you get: Single agents and multi-agent systems on Amazon Bedrock AgentCore, or on Amazon Bedrock Agents when a managed setup fits
Best fit when: You know the workflow and need it in production
Pilot-to-production rescue
What you get: Root-cause review of a stalled pilot, then a rebuild of what blocks go-live
Best fit when: A proof of concept works in a demo and fails on real traffic
SaaS app-to-agent conversion
What you get: Product functions exposed as governed, callable tools, or agent-native interfaces that replace forms and clicks
Best fit when: Your product needs to be a tool other agents can call
Governance and compliance engineering
What you get: Approval rules, audit logging, data residency, and control mapping
Best fit when: Regulators or auditors will review the agent
Run and optimize
What you get: Regression runs, cost tuning, and model upgrades after go-live
Best fit when: You want accuracy to hold as models and data change

If you are still choosing between generative AI use cases rather than building a specific agent, start with our generative AI consulting services instead.

Every engagement ships with:

  • A production agent running in your AWS account
  • A golden dataset and an automated evaluation suite
  • A tool permission map with human approval thresholds
  • Observability dashboards with cost per completed task
  • Architecture and control documentation your auditors can review
  • A runbook, architecture decision records, an on-call handover, and enablement sessions for your operations team

Start with one workflow

We'll tell you whether it is production-viable and what it will take.

One conversation with an FDE who has shipped agents on AWS.

Talk to an FDE

What Is the AI Agent Development Process, From Assessment to Go-Live?

The Mactores AI agent development process runs in five phases: assess, design, build, test, and deploy. Each phase closes with a signed exit, so your leadership approves working software before the next phase begins. No agent reaches live traffic until it passes a ten-point readiness scorecard that your business owner helps set.

  1. 01

    Step 01

    Assess

    What happens
    Use cases ranked; data, systems, and risk mapped; production date set
    Owner
    Shared

    Signed exit

    Approved use case, success metrics, and fixed-fee SOW

  2. 02

    Step 02

    Design

    What happens
    Agent behavior, tool permissions, approval thresholds, and evaluation plan defined
    Owner
    FDEs

    Signed exit

    Signed architecture and control design

  3. 03

    Step 03

    Build

    What happens
    Agents provision the infrastructure and generate tests; FDEs build tools, retrieval, and prompts
    Owner
    Agents and FDEs

    Signed exit

    Working agent on real data in a non-production environment

  4. 04

    Step 04

    Test

    What happens
    Golden-dataset evaluation, red teaming, load tests, and a shadow run against live traffic
    Owner
    Agents and FDEs

    Signed exit

    Readiness scorecard passed and signed

  5. 05

    Step 05

    Deploy

    What happens
    Staged cutover, live monitoring, and runbook handover
    Owner
    Shared

    Signed exit

    Customer-signed acceptance

The readiness scorecard every agent passes before go-live:

  1. 01

    Task success measured against a golden dataset, with a pass threshold set by the business owner

  2. 02

    Groundedness checked on every retrieval-based answer

  3. 03

    Tool-call accuracy tested, including wrong-tool and wrong-parameter cases

  4. 04

    Least-privilege permissions per tool

  5. 05

    Approval thresholds set by the risk and reversibility of each action

  6. 06

    Latency and cost budgets enforced in monitoring

  7. 07

    Regression suites run before every prompt, model, or tool change

  8. 08

    Step-level traces for every reasoning step, tool call, and data source

  9. 09

    Rollback and a kill switch rehearsed before cutover

  10. 10

    A runbook and an on-call owner in place

Agents are only as dependable as the data they retrieve. When assessment shows the source systems are not ready, Mactores runs data platform modernization alongside the agent build, so the data work is scoped into the same production date.

Start at assessment

The first phase ends with a fixed fee and a production date in writing.

Everything after that runs against those signatures.

Book the assessment

What Results Have Mactores' Production AI Agents Delivered?

Two Mactores agent programs are public. KlearTrust's claims review used to take six months by hand; its HIPAA-compliant agentic claims platform reached production 12 weeks after kickoff and cleared HIPAA review and internal audit on the first cycle. Safaricom, Africa's largest telco, moved customer support from scripted flows to intent-based agents and saw value in 12 weeks.

These are two of 21+ public Mactores programs across data platforms, applications, and AI agents. In a working session, we walk you through the reference closest to your workflow, including how it was evaluated and how the cutover ran. You can browse all Mactores customer stories before that conversation.

Ask for the closest reference

Same industry, similar workflow, same compliance pressure.

We walk you through how it was evaluated and how the cutover ran.

Request a reference

How Does Mactores Build AI Agents on Amazon Bedrock AgentCore?

Mactores builds production AI agents on Amazon Bedrock for models and on Amazon Bedrock AgentCore for everything around them: runtime, gateway, identity, memory, policy, evaluations, and observability. Model access is table stakes. Most of the engineering goes into those surrounding layers, because they decide whether an agent survives a security review, an audit, and a traffic spike.

Two AgentCore capabilities carry extra weight for regulated buyers. AgentCore Policy enforces what an agent may do at every tool call, outside the agent's own code. AgentCore Evaluations, now generally available, scores agent quality before release and keeps scoring it in production.

Layer
What we use
Models
What we use: Anthropic Claude, Amazon Nova, Meta Llama, and Mistral through Amazon Bedrock
Agent runtime
What we use: Amazon Bedrock AgentCore Runtime, Strands Agents, LangGraph
Tools and integration
What we use: AgentCore Gateway, Model Context Protocol (MCP), AWS Lambda, Amazon API Gateway
Identity and access
What we use: AgentCore Identity, AWS IAM, AWS PrivateLink
Policy and safety
What we use: AgentCore Policy, Amazon Bedrock Guardrails, PII redaction, prompt-injection testing
Memory and retrieval
What we use: AgentCore Memory, Amazon Bedrock Knowledge Bases, Amazon OpenSearch Serverless, Amazon Aurora with pgvector
Evaluation
What we use: AgentCore Evaluations, golden datasets, automated regression suites
Orchestration
What we use: AWS Step Functions, Amazon EventBridge
Observability and audit
What we use: AgentCore Observability, Amazon CloudWatch, OpenTelemetry, AWS CloudTrail, AWS KMS

Should You Use Amazon Bedrock Agents or Amazon Bedrock AgentCore?

Choose Amazon Bedrock Agents for a contained, configuration-driven agent. Choose Amazon Bedrock AgentCore when you need framework choice, governed tool access, persistent memory, agent identity, and step-level traces. Regulated, multi-system agents usually land on AgentCore.

Option
Choose it when
Amazon Bedrock Agents
Choose it when: You want a managed, configuration-driven agent with fewer moving parts
Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
Choose it when: You need framework choice, session isolation, governed tool access, persistent memory, identity, and step-level observability

See it on your stack

We map the architecture to your AWS accounts, data, and systems in one session.

Bring your account structure and the systems the agent has to touch.

Review my architecture

How Do You Make AI Agents Compliant With HIPAA, SOC 2, and the EU AI Act?

You make AI agents compliant by designing controls into the architecture rather than reviewing them after launch. Mactores builds four control layers into every agent: action, data, evidence, and change controls. Together they produce the logs, traces, and evaluation reports that auditors ask for under HIPAA, SOC 2, GDPR, and the EU AI Act.

Security teams want to know what an agent can touch, who approved it, and how a decision can be replayed months later. In IBM’s 2026 study of 2,000 executives, 59% of tech CxOs cited security and compliance concerns as top barriers to scaling AI agents. The four layers answer those questions in the build:

  • Action controls. Every tool carries a risk tier, AgentCore Policy enforces it at each call, and high-impact actions route to a human approver.

  • Data controls. PII and PHI are redacted or tokenized before they reach a model.

  • Evidence controls. Decisions trace to source data, prompts, model versions, and tool calls.

  • Change controls. Prompts, tools, and models are versioned and released through review gates.

  • SEC — compliance framework Mactores designs AI agent controls to
  • HIPAA — compliance framework Mactores designs AI agent controls to
  • FFIEC — compliance framework Mactores designs AI agent controls to
  • GDPR — compliance framework Mactores designs AI agent controls to
Framework
Where it applies
How Mactores supports it on AWS
HIPAA
Where it applies: US healthcare, PHI
How Mactores supports it on AWS: HIPAA-eligible services under a BAA, PHI redaction, decision logs
SOC 2
Where it applies: SaaS and service providers
How Mactores supports it on AWS: Versioned releases, access reviews, monitoring evidence
PCI DSS
Where it applies: Payments and cardholder data
How Mactores supports it on AWS: Tokenization, network isolation, scoped tool access
US bank model risk guidance
Where it applies: US banking
How Mactores supports it on AWS: Model inventory entries, evaluation reports, and drift monitoring
NIST AI RMF
Where it applies: Any US AI program
How Mactores supports it on AWS: Risk register per use case, mapped to evaluation controls
ISO/IEC 42001
Where it applies: AI management systems, any region
How Mactores supports it on AWS: Impact assessments and lifecycle controls documented per agent
GDPR
Where it applies: EU personal data
How Mactores supports it on AWS: EU AWS Regions, data minimization, memory retention rules
EU AI Act
Where it applies: AI used in the EU market
How Mactores supports it on AWS: Risk classification, oversight design, retained logs
DORA
Where it applies: EU financial entities
How Mactores supports it on AWS: Resilience testing, incident logging, third-party risk records

US banks: the interagency model risk guidance that replaced SR 11-7 leaves generative and agentic AI out of its scope and points banks to their broader risk governance instead. Examiners still ask for evidence, so we produce what a model validation team would expect anyway.

Data residency: agents, retrieval stores, memory, and logs deploy in the AWS Region your policy requires, including EU Regions. Under the EU’s Digital Omnibus on AI, obligations for stand-alone high-risk AI systems now apply from 2 December 2027, which gives European teams time to design oversight into the build.

These rows describe how the build supports each framework. Certification and attestation stay with you and your auditors.

Audit-ready by design

Bring your control framework. We map every agent action to it.

Action, data, evidence, and change controls, mapped before the build.

Talk compliance

Which Industries Does Mactores Modernize Oracle and SQL Server Databases For?

We work across five sectors: banks and insurers, healthcare and life sciences, SaaS, manufacturing, and TMEGS. Same contract for all of them. What shifts is the running order. An examiner, a PHI auditor, a weekly release train, a plant manager and a finals-night traffic spike each change which database goes first and what it has to prove before cutover.

Financial Services

Dispute handling, KYC document review, and reconciliation exceptions, with audit trails and data lineage that hold up to SEC and FFIEC expectations. Agents that move money or change accounts stay behind human approval until their evaluation record earns more autonomy.

AI agents for financial services

Healthcare and Life Sciences

Claims review, prior authorization support, and clinical document summarization, built for PHI handling and validated systems. Clinicians keep the edge cases, and every recommendation traces back to the source record.

AI agents for healthcare and life sciences

Internet and Software

Support resolution agents and SaaS app-to-agent conversion, so your product becomes a tool that other agents call, with multi-tenant isolation from day one.

AI agents for internet and software companies

Manufacturing

Maintenance triage, quality deviation analysis, and supplier communication, designed with OT and SCADA awareness so the line keeps running. Agents recommend, and operators keep control of plant systems.

AI agents for manufacturing

Telco, Media, Entertainment, Gaming, and Sports (TMEGS)

Intent-based customer service and content operations built for peak load and real-time response, sized for launch nights, finals, and live events.

AI agents for TMEGS

Scoped to your sector

Your regulators, your systems, your peak season.

Talk to the industry lead who has shipped agents in your sector.

Talk to an industry lead

How Much Does AI Agent Development Cost, and How Long Does It Take?

AI agent development cost depends on four drivers: how many systems the agent integrates with, how ready the data is, how much compliance evidence the workflow needs, and how deep evaluation must go. Mactores quotes every build as a fixed fee after scoping, with the production date in the SOW. KlearTrust’s regulated claims agent took 12 weeks.

Pricing note

Every engagement is quoted as a fixed fee after a scoping session. The tiers below show how scope moves cost and timeline. Your SOW sets the actual figures, and the full commercial terms sit on our commitment page.

Scope tier
Typical scope
Main cost drivers
Timeline
Single-workflow agent
Typical scope: One workflow, existing APIs, mostly read actions
Main cost drivers: Integration count, data readiness
Timeline: Weeks, set in the SOW
Regulated workflow agent
Typical scope: PHI or cardholder data, human approvals, audit evidence
Main cost drivers: Compliance scope, evaluation depth
Timeline: Reference: 12 weeks for KlearTrust
Multi-agent system or SaaS app-to-agent conversion
Typical scope: Several agents, product tools exposed through MCP, multi-tenant
Main cost drivers: Orchestration, tenancy isolation, scale testing
Timeline: Set in the SOW after scoping

Run cost. After go-live, we track one number with your finance team: cost per completed task. Add monthly model inference, platform consumption, retrieval, observability, and human review time, then divide by the tasks the agent completed without escalation. That figure lets you compare the agent directly against the process it replaces.

Funding. The first agent rarely needs a new budget line. A database license due for renewal, or middleware that costs more to maintain than it returns, is spend that can be retired and redirected. Many Mactores customers fund their first production agents by retiring it through application and database modernization.

Get a number for your scope

A fixed fee and a production date for your workflow, in writing.

Quoted after one scoping session.

Get my fixed quote

How Do You Choose an AI Agent Development Company on AWS?

Choose an AI agent development company on what it will put in writing: a production date, a fixed fee, signed phase exits, ownership of the code and evaluation data, and a handover plan. Then verify its AWS credentials in the AWS Partner Solutions Finder. Mactores is an AWS Premier Tier Services Partner with the AWS Agentic AI Specialization.

Four questions separate a production partner from a pilot shop:

  1. 01

    Will the production date and the fee be in the SOW, and who pays when the date slips?

  2. 02

    Which evaluation results must the agent pass before go-live, and who sets the threshold?

  3. 03

    Who owns the code, prompts, tool definitions, and evaluation datasets after handover?

  4. 04

    Who on your side will run the agent, and when does that handover start?

7 Consulting Competencies

  • AWS Partner Data & Analytics Services Competency
  • AWS Partner Migration Services Competency
  • AWS Partner DevOps Services Competency
  • AWS Partner ML Services Competency
  • AWS Partner AI Services Competency
  • AWS Partner Healthcare Services Competency
  • AWS Partner Manufacturing and Industrial Services Competency

Whichever AI agent development company you shortlist, confirm its credentials in the AWS Partner Solutions Finder. The full list of Mactores competencies and service validations sits on our AWS partnership page.

AWS AI credentials, verified

Ask your AWS account team about Mactores, or ask us directly.

Premier Tier, with the AWS Agentic AI Specialization.

Talk to us

What Do Common AI Agent Development Terms Mean?

AI agent
Software that plans steps, calls tools, and reads or writes data in business systems to complete a task with limited supervision.
Agentic AI
AI systems that pursue a goal across several steps, choosing tools and actions instead of returning a single response.
Agent-native firm
A firm whose delivery model depends on agents doing most of the engagement work, with FDEs owning judgment and outcomes.
Forward-deployed engineer (FDE)
A Mactores specialist who embeds with your team, owns architecture and cutover decisions, and carries the delivery commitment.
Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
AWS services for running agents in production: runtime, gateway, identity, memory, policy, evaluations, and observability.
Model Context Protocol (MCP)
An open protocol that exposes systems and APIs to agents as callable tools.
Golden dataset
A curated set of real cases with known correct outcomes, used to measure an agent before and after every change.
Groundedness
The degree to which an agent's answer is supported by the source documents it retrieved.
Human-in-the-loop
A design in which a person approves an agent's action before it executes, usually for high-impact or irreversible steps.
Shadow run
A test in which the agent processes live traffic alongside the current process, without its actions taking effect.
Cost per completed task
Total monthly run cost divided by the tasks an agent finished without escalation.
Signed exit
Customer approval that closes a delivery phase and confirms what was delivered before the next phase starts.

Frequently Asked Questions About AI Agent Development Services

What are AI agent development services?

AI agent development services cover the design, build, evaluation, and deployment of software agents that reason over data and take actions in business systems. A complete engagement includes use-case selection, integration with existing APIs, guardrails, human approval rules, observability, and handover, so the agent runs reliably in production.

Should we build AI agents in-house or hire an AI agent development company?

Build in-house when you already run production ML systems, have evaluation tooling, and can name an owner for agent risk. Hire a partner when the first agent has to reach production on a fixed date and your team needs to learn the patterns along the way. Either way, plan the handover from the first sprint, so your team can run and change the agent after the partner steps back.

How long does it take to move an AI agent from pilot to production?

Most production agents Mactores delivers go live in weeks. KlearTrust's regulated claims platform reached production 12 weeks after kickoff. The schedule depends on integration complexity, data readiness, and compliance review. Stalled pilots often move faster, because part of the work exists and the rescue focuses on evaluation, permissions, and monitoring.

How much does it cost to build and run an enterprise AI agent?

Build cost depends on integration depth, data readiness, compliance scope, and evaluation effort. Run cost depends on model inference, platform consumption, retrieval, observability, and human review. Mactores prices builds as fixed-fee engagements with a contracted production date and recommends tracking cost per completed task after go-live.

What is the difference between an AI agent and a chatbot?

A chatbot answers questions within a conversation. An AI agent plans steps, calls tools, reads and writes data in business systems, and completes tasks with limited supervision. That ability to act is why agents need permission scoping, approval thresholds, audit trails, and rollback, which most chatbot projects never had to consider.

How do you measure whether an AI agent is working?

Against a golden dataset of real cases with known outcomes, before launch and after every change. Mactores tracks task success, groundedness, tool-call accuracy, escalation rate, latency, and cost per completed task, and the business owner sets the pass threshold. A release that falls below the threshold doesn't ship.

Can AI agents meet HIPAA, SOC 2, GDPR, and EU AI Act requirements?

Yes, when controls are designed into the architecture from the start. That means HIPAA-eligible AWS services under a BAA, PHI and PII redaction, regional data residency, versioned releases, decision logs, and human oversight sized to each action's risk. Compliance is evidenced through logs and evaluation reports that auditors can review directly.

How do you stop an AI agent from taking the wrong action?

We assign every tool a risk tier, grant least-privilege access per tool, and route high-impact actions to a human approver. Agents are tested against wrong-tool and wrong-parameter cases before launch. In production, traces capture each decision, cost and latency budgets trigger alerts, and a rehearsed kill switch can pause the agent immediately.

Can you take over an AI agent pilot another team built?

Yes. We start with a root-cause review that covers the test data, permissions, cost profile, and ownership model. Most stalled pilots fail on evaluation, governance, or integration. We keep what works, rebuild what blocks go-live, and commit to a production date once the review is complete.

Who owns the code, prompts, and evaluation data?

You do. Mactores hands over the agent code, prompts, tool definitions, evaluation datasets, and documentation built for your workflows when the engagement closes, and the statement of work records those terms next to the exit plan. Clear ownership is what lets your internal team run, audit, and extend the agent after handover.

Can AI agents run in EU AWS Regions for European data requirements?

Yes. Agents, retrieval stores, memory, and logs can be deployed in EU AWS Regions, with model access configured to keep data processing in the region your policy requires. Pair regional deployment with data minimization in prompts and retention rules for agent memory to support GDPR and EU AI Act obligations.

What do we need ready before an AI agent engagement starts?

You need one target workflow, a business owner who can define what a correct outcome looks like, access to the systems the agent will touch, and a sample of real historical cases. We handle the rest during assessment, including data readiness checks, risk mapping, and the production date written into the SOW.

Ask us directly

Ask us directly

Questions about your workflow, stack, or compliance scope.

Email lets-talk@mactores.com

Ask a question

Is Your AI Agent Pilot Stuck Before Production?

Get a fixed date and a fixed fee for the agent your board keeps asking about.

  1. 01

    Bring one workflow to a working session with our FDEs.

  2. 02

    Get a go or no-go, a scope, and a production date within five business days.

  3. 03

    Sign a fixed-fee SOW and start the assessment phase.

Every engagement carries a 30-day satisfaction guarantee and a 90-day warranty on production defects.