AI Agent Development Services: From Pilot to Production on AWS
- AI Agent Development
- Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
- Agentic AI on AWS
Mactores' AI agent development services design, build, and ship agents into your live systems on AWS, on a production date written into the SOW, for a fee fixed before the build starts.
Agents reach production when someone owns the hard parts: permissions, evaluation, integration, and the go-live sign-off. Mactores puts that ownership in the contract. Agents carry the repetitive engineering. Mactores FDEs sit inside your team and carry the judgment calls through cutover. Once you sign acceptance, the agent belongs to your operations team.
Get a production date for your agent
Bring one workflow. Leave with a go or no-go, a scope, and a date.
A working session with Mactores FDEs.
- AWS Partner Network
- Premier Tier
- AWS Specialization
- Agentic AI
- Competencies incl. Generative AI
- 7 Competencies
- AWS-certified practitioners
- 200+
60 to 70%
approximate share of engagement hours agents absorb versus a traditional proposal of equivalent scope
12 weeks
from kickoff to KlearTrust's production HIPAA claims platform
21+
public case studies
200+
AWS-certified practitioners on the Mactores team
2008
shipping on AWS since
Top Mactores Clients
On this page Close Open
Why Do AI Agent Pilots Stall Before Production?
AI agent pilots stall because a pilot and a production agent are different jobs. A pilot answers questions in a sandbox. A production agent writes to your ERP, touches regulated data, and has to behave when a user tries something nobody scripted. Most pilot budgets fund the first job and none of the second.
The agent then waits in a demo environment while the board asks when it will ship. The market numbers show how common that is.
17%
of organizations have deployed AI agents so far, according to the 2026 Gartner CIO and Technology Executive Survey. More than 60% expect to within two years.
40%
of organizations with at least $1 billion in revenue now scale AI agents in one or more functions, up from 27%, according to McKinsey's The State of AI in 2026. Smaller organizations stayed flat at 22%.
The pattern is familiar from the pilots we are asked to rescue. Before KlearTrust came to Mactores, two of its automation pilots had stalled at the handoff from strategy to build, because PHI handling and audit requirements outgrew the team staffed to deliver them. The table maps the symptoms we look for to their usual causes.
Pilot stuck in a sandbox?
We review what blocks go-live, keep what works, and commit to a production date.
Bring the pilot you have, and the reason it has not shipped.
How Does Fixed-Date, Fixed-Fee Enterprise AI Agent Development Work?
Enterprise AI agent development at Mactores runs on agent-native delivery. About two-thirds of engagement hours go to agents, which take the repetitive build, test, and tracing work. FDEs own every decision that carries risk. That split is what lets Mactores fix the scope, the fee, and the production date in the SOW before the build starts.
Agents absorb the scale
- Agent orchestration
- Evaluation harness and test generation
- Retrieval pipelines
- Observability and tracing
Approximately 60 to 70% of engagement hours
FDEs own the judgment
- What the agent is allowed to do on its own
- Human approval thresholds
- Model selection and data preparation
- Integration design
- Production cutover
The commercial terms follow from that split. Scope, fee, and production date are fixed in the SOW once assessment closes. If a delay is ours, we absorb the overage. Delays caused by customer dependencies convert to time and materials at a rate disclosed in the SOW. A 90-day warranty then covers production defects after acceptance, at no charge to you. Across Mactores engagements, 94% have been delivered on or ahead of the committed date.
The handover is planned on day one, and for good reason. Gartner predicts that 70% of enterprises will abandon agentic AI built by vendor forward-deployed engineering by 2028, largely because internal teams can't maintain those systems once the vendor's people leave. Mactores designs against that outcome. FDEs pair with your domain experts and platform team from the first sprint, every phase closes with a signed exit, and runbooks and architecture decision records ship with the agent. Your team runs it after go-live, which is where the knowledge of how it works needs to live.
The delivery model in full
See how agents and FDEs split the work, phase by phase.
The same model runs every Mactores engagement.
What Do Mactores' AI Agent Development Services Include?
Mactores' AI agent development services cover six entry points: agent readiness assessment, custom AI agent development, pilot-to-production rescue, SaaS app-to-agent conversion, governance and compliance engineering, and run-and-optimize support. Whether your team calls it AI agent development or agentic AI development services, each engagement is scoped to one business workflow and one production date.
This page covers the build side of AI Agents for Apps, one of the three Mactores delivery pillars. Pick the entry point that matches where you are today.
If you are still choosing between generative AI use cases rather than building a specific agent, start with our generative AI consulting services instead.
Every engagement ships with:
- A production agent running in your AWS account
- A golden dataset and an automated evaluation suite
- A tool permission map with human approval thresholds
- Observability dashboards with cost per completed task
- Architecture and control documentation your auditors can review
- A runbook, architecture decision records, an on-call handover, and enablement sessions for your operations team
Start with one workflow
We'll tell you whether it is production-viable and what it will take.
One conversation with an FDE who has shipped agents on AWS.
What Is the AI Agent Development Process, From Assessment to Go-Live?
The Mactores AI agent development process runs in five phases: assess, design, build, test, and deploy. Each phase closes with a signed exit, so your leadership approves working software before the next phase begins. No agent reaches live traffic until it passes a ten-point readiness scorecard that your business owner helps set.
-
01
Step 01
Assess
- What happens
- Use cases ranked; data, systems, and risk mapped; production date set
- Owner
- Shared
Signed exit
Approved use case, success metrics, and fixed-fee SOW
-
02
Step 02
Design
- What happens
- Agent behavior, tool permissions, approval thresholds, and evaluation plan defined
- Owner
- FDEs
Signed exit
Signed architecture and control design
-
03
Step 03
Build
- What happens
- Agents provision the infrastructure and generate tests; FDEs build tools, retrieval, and prompts
- Owner
- Agents and FDEs
Signed exit
Working agent on real data in a non-production environment
-
04
Step 04
Test
- What happens
- Golden-dataset evaluation, red teaming, load tests, and a shadow run against live traffic
- Owner
- Agents and FDEs
Signed exit
Readiness scorecard passed and signed
-
05
Step 05
Deploy
- What happens
- Staged cutover, live monitoring, and runbook handover
- Owner
- Shared
Signed exit
Customer-signed acceptance
The readiness scorecard every agent passes before go-live:
-
01
Task success measured against a golden dataset, with a pass threshold set by the business owner
-
02
Groundedness checked on every retrieval-based answer
-
03
Tool-call accuracy tested, including wrong-tool and wrong-parameter cases
-
04
Least-privilege permissions per tool
-
05
Approval thresholds set by the risk and reversibility of each action
-
06
Latency and cost budgets enforced in monitoring
-
07
Regression suites run before every prompt, model, or tool change
-
08
Step-level traces for every reasoning step, tool call, and data source
-
09
Rollback and a kill switch rehearsed before cutover
-
10
A runbook and an on-call owner in place
Agents are only as dependable as the data they retrieve. When assessment shows the source systems are not ready, Mactores runs data platform modernization alongside the agent build, so the data work is scoped into the same production date.
Start at assessment
The first phase ends with a fixed fee and a production date in writing.
Everything after that runs against those signatures.
What Results Have Mactores' Production AI Agents Delivered?
Two Mactores agent programs are public. KlearTrust's claims review used to take six months by hand; its HIPAA-compliant agentic claims platform reached production 12 weeks after kickoff and cleared HIPAA review and internal audit on the first cycle. Safaricom, Africa's largest telco, moved customer support from scripted flows to intent-based agents and saw value in 12 weeks.
KlearTrust · Healthcare and Life Sciences
12 weeks
From kickoff to a production HIPAA-compliant agentic claims platform
Claims decisions in days, not months
Two earlier automation pilots had stalled on PHI handling and audit demands. Mactores shipped a HIPAA-compliant agentic claims platform in 12 weeks. The agent clears the roughly 80% of claims that fall inside its authority, clinicians keep the edge cases, and audit evidence is captured at decision time.
Read the KlearTrust case study →Safaricom · Telco, Media, Entertainment, Gaming, and Sports
~80%
Of routine intents moved off human agents
Support that understands intent
Scripted flow trees broke whenever a customer phrased a request differently, so escalations piled up. Mactores built Zuri, an agentic support experience with grounded retrieval, multi-agent orchestration across billing, account, product, and troubleshooting, and guardrails on identity and account changes. Human agents moved off the roughly 80% of intents that are routine.
Read the Safaricom case study →These are two of 21+ public Mactores programs across data platforms, applications, and AI agents. In a working session, we walk you through the reference closest to your workflow, including how it was evaluated and how the cutover ran. You can browse all Mactores customer stories before that conversation.
Ask for the closest reference
Same industry, similar workflow, same compliance pressure.
We walk you through how it was evaluated and how the cutover ran.
How Does Mactores Build AI Agents on Amazon Bedrock AgentCore?
Mactores builds production AI agents on Amazon Bedrock for models and on Amazon Bedrock AgentCore for everything around them: runtime, gateway, identity, memory, policy, evaluations, and observability. Model access is table stakes. Most of the engineering goes into those surrounding layers, because they decide whether an agent survives a security review, an audit, and a traffic spike.
Two AgentCore capabilities carry extra weight for regulated buyers. AgentCore Policy enforces what an agent may do at every tool call, outside the agent's own code. AgentCore Evaluations, now generally available, scores agent quality before release and keeps scoring it in production.
Should You Use Amazon Bedrock Agents or Amazon Bedrock AgentCore?
Choose Amazon Bedrock Agents for a contained, configuration-driven agent. Choose Amazon Bedrock AgentCore when you need framework choice, governed tool access, persistent memory, agent identity, and step-level traces. Regulated, multi-system agents usually land on AgentCore.
See it on your stack
We map the architecture to your AWS accounts, data, and systems in one session.
Bring your account structure and the systems the agent has to touch.
How Do You Make AI Agents Compliant With HIPAA, SOC 2, and the EU AI Act?
You make AI agents compliant by designing controls into the architecture rather than reviewing them after launch. Mactores builds four control layers into every agent: action, data, evidence, and change controls. Together they produce the logs, traces, and evaluation reports that auditors ask for under HIPAA, SOC 2, GDPR, and the EU AI Act.
Security teams want to know what an agent can touch, who approved it, and how a decision can be replayed months later. In IBM’s 2026 study of 2,000 executives, 59% of tech CxOs cited security and compliance concerns as top barriers to scaling AI agents. The four layers answer those questions in the build:
-
Action controls. Every tool carries a risk tier, AgentCore Policy enforces it at each call, and high-impact actions route to a human approver.
-
Data controls. PII and PHI are redacted or tokenized before they reach a model.
-
Evidence controls. Decisions trace to source data, prompts, model versions, and tool calls.
-
Change controls. Prompts, tools, and models are versioned and released through review gates.
US banks: the interagency model risk guidance that replaced SR 11-7 leaves generative and agentic AI out of its scope and points banks to their broader risk governance instead. Examiners still ask for evidence, so we produce what a model validation team would expect anyway.
Data residency: agents, retrieval stores, memory, and logs deploy in the AWS Region your policy requires, including EU Regions. Under the EU’s Digital Omnibus on AI, obligations for stand-alone high-risk AI systems now apply from 2 December 2027, which gives European teams time to design oversight into the build.
These rows describe how the build supports each framework. Certification and attestation stay with you and your auditors.
Audit-ready by design
Bring your control framework. We map every agent action to it.
Action, data, evidence, and change controls, mapped before the build.
Which Industries Does Mactores Modernize Oracle and SQL Server Databases For?
We work across five sectors: banks and insurers, healthcare and life sciences, SaaS, manufacturing, and TMEGS. Same contract for all of them. What shifts is the running order. An examiner, a PHI auditor, a weekly release train, a plant manager and a finals-night traffic spike each change which database goes first and what it has to prove before cutover.
Financial Services
Dispute handling, KYC document review, and reconciliation exceptions, with audit trails and data lineage that hold up to SEC and FFIEC expectations. Agents that move money or change accounts stay behind human approval until their evaluation record earns more autonomy.
AI agents for financial services →Healthcare and Life Sciences
Claims review, prior authorization support, and clinical document summarization, built for PHI handling and validated systems. Clinicians keep the edge cases, and every recommendation traces back to the source record.
AI agents for healthcare and life sciences →Internet and Software
Support resolution agents and SaaS app-to-agent conversion, so your product becomes a tool that other agents call, with multi-tenant isolation from day one.
AI agents for internet and software companies →Manufacturing
Maintenance triage, quality deviation analysis, and supplier communication, designed with OT and SCADA awareness so the line keeps running. Agents recommend, and operators keep control of plant systems.
AI agents for manufacturing →Telco, Media, Entertainment, Gaming, and Sports (TMEGS)
Intent-based customer service and content operations built for peak load and real-time response, sized for launch nights, finals, and live events.
AI agents for TMEGS →Scoped to your sector
Your regulators, your systems, your peak season.
Talk to the industry lead who has shipped agents in your sector.
How Much Does AI Agent Development Cost, and How Long Does It Take?
AI agent development cost depends on four drivers: how many systems the agent integrates with, how ready the data is, how much compliance evidence the workflow needs, and how deep evaluation must go. Mactores quotes every build as a fixed fee after scoping, with the production date in the SOW. KlearTrust’s regulated claims agent took 12 weeks.
Pricing note
Every engagement is quoted as a fixed fee after a scoping session. The tiers below show how scope moves cost and timeline. Your SOW sets the actual figures, and the full commercial terms sit on our commitment page.
Run cost. After go-live, we track one number with your finance team: cost per completed task. Add monthly model inference, platform consumption, retrieval, observability, and human review time, then divide by the tasks the agent completed without escalation. That figure lets you compare the agent directly against the process it replaces.
Funding. The first agent rarely needs a new budget line. A database license due for renewal, or middleware that costs more to maintain than it returns, is spend that can be retired and redirected. Many Mactores customers fund their first production agents by retiring it through application and database modernization.
Get a number for your scope
A fixed fee and a production date for your workflow, in writing.
Quoted after one scoping session.
How Do You Choose an AI Agent Development Company on AWS?
Choose an AI agent development company on what it will put in writing: a production date, a fixed fee, signed phase exits, ownership of the code and evaluation data, and a handover plan. Then verify its AWS credentials in the AWS Partner Solutions Finder. Mactores is an AWS Premier Tier Services Partner with the AWS Agentic AI Specialization.
Four questions separate a production partner from a pilot shop:
-
01
Will the production date and the fee be in the SOW, and who pays when the date slips?
-
02
Which evaluation results must the agent pass before go-live, and who sets the threshold?
-
03
Who owns the code, prompts, tool definitions, and evaluation datasets after handover?
-
04
Who on your side will run the agent, and when does that handover start?
7 Consulting Competencies
Whichever AI agent development company you shortlist, confirm its credentials in the AWS Partner Solutions Finder. The full list of Mactores competencies and service validations sits on our AWS partnership page.
AWS AI credentials, verified
Ask your AWS account team about Mactores, or ask us directly.
Premier Tier, with the AWS Agentic AI Specialization.
What Do Common AI Agent Development Terms Mean?
- AI agent
- Software that plans steps, calls tools, and reads or writes data in business systems to complete a task with limited supervision.
- Agentic AI
- AI systems that pursue a goal across several steps, choosing tools and actions instead of returning a single response.
- Agent-native firm
- A firm whose delivery model depends on agents doing most of the engagement work, with FDEs owning judgment and outcomes.
- Forward-deployed engineer (FDE)
- A Mactores specialist who embeds with your team, owns architecture and cutover decisions, and carries the delivery commitment.
- Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
- AWS services for running agents in production: runtime, gateway, identity, memory, policy, evaluations, and observability.
- Model Context Protocol (MCP)
- An open protocol that exposes systems and APIs to agents as callable tools.
- Golden dataset
- A curated set of real cases with known correct outcomes, used to measure an agent before and after every change.
- Groundedness
- The degree to which an agent's answer is supported by the source documents it retrieved.
- Human-in-the-loop
- A design in which a person approves an agent's action before it executes, usually for high-impact or irreversible steps.
- Shadow run
- A test in which the agent processes live traffic alongside the current process, without its actions taking effect.
- Cost per completed task
- Total monthly run cost divided by the tasks an agent finished without escalation.
- Signed exit
- Customer approval that closes a delivery phase and confirms what was delivered before the next phase starts.
Frequently Asked Questions About AI Agent Development Services
What are AI agent development services?
AI agent development services cover the design, build, evaluation, and deployment of software agents that reason over data and take actions in business systems. A complete engagement includes use-case selection, integration with existing APIs, guardrails, human approval rules, observability, and handover, so the agent runs reliably in production.
Should we build AI agents in-house or hire an AI agent development company?
Build in-house when you already run production ML systems, have evaluation tooling, and can name an owner for agent risk. Hire a partner when the first agent has to reach production on a fixed date and your team needs to learn the patterns along the way. Either way, plan the handover from the first sprint, so your team can run and change the agent after the partner steps back.
How long does it take to move an AI agent from pilot to production?
Most production agents Mactores delivers go live in weeks. KlearTrust's regulated claims platform reached production 12 weeks after kickoff. The schedule depends on integration complexity, data readiness, and compliance review. Stalled pilots often move faster, because part of the work exists and the rescue focuses on evaluation, permissions, and monitoring.
How much does it cost to build and run an enterprise AI agent?
Build cost depends on integration depth, data readiness, compliance scope, and evaluation effort. Run cost depends on model inference, platform consumption, retrieval, observability, and human review. Mactores prices builds as fixed-fee engagements with a contracted production date and recommends tracking cost per completed task after go-live.
What is the difference between an AI agent and a chatbot?
A chatbot answers questions within a conversation. An AI agent plans steps, calls tools, reads and writes data in business systems, and completes tasks with limited supervision. That ability to act is why agents need permission scoping, approval thresholds, audit trails, and rollback, which most chatbot projects never had to consider.
How do you measure whether an AI agent is working?
Against a golden dataset of real cases with known outcomes, before launch and after every change. Mactores tracks task success, groundedness, tool-call accuracy, escalation rate, latency, and cost per completed task, and the business owner sets the pass threshold. A release that falls below the threshold doesn't ship.
Can AI agents meet HIPAA, SOC 2, GDPR, and EU AI Act requirements?
Yes, when controls are designed into the architecture from the start. That means HIPAA-eligible AWS services under a BAA, PHI and PII redaction, regional data residency, versioned releases, decision logs, and human oversight sized to each action's risk. Compliance is evidenced through logs and evaluation reports that auditors can review directly.
How do you stop an AI agent from taking the wrong action?
We assign every tool a risk tier, grant least-privilege access per tool, and route high-impact actions to a human approver. Agents are tested against wrong-tool and wrong-parameter cases before launch. In production, traces capture each decision, cost and latency budgets trigger alerts, and a rehearsed kill switch can pause the agent immediately.
Can you take over an AI agent pilot another team built?
Yes. We start with a root-cause review that covers the test data, permissions, cost profile, and ownership model. Most stalled pilots fail on evaluation, governance, or integration. We keep what works, rebuild what blocks go-live, and commit to a production date once the review is complete.
Who owns the code, prompts, and evaluation data?
You do. Mactores hands over the agent code, prompts, tool definitions, evaluation datasets, and documentation built for your workflows when the engagement closes, and the statement of work records those terms next to the exit plan. Clear ownership is what lets your internal team run, audit, and extend the agent after handover.
Can AI agents run in EU AWS Regions for European data requirements?
Yes. Agents, retrieval stores, memory, and logs can be deployed in EU AWS Regions, with model access configured to keep data processing in the region your policy requires. Pair regional deployment with data minimization in prompts and retention rules for agent memory to support GDPR and EU AI Act obligations.
What do we need ready before an AI agent engagement starts?
You need one target workflow, a business owner who can define what a correct outcome looks like, access to the systems the agent will touch, and a sample of real historical cases. We handle the rest during assessment, including data readiness checks, risk mapping, and the production date written into the SOW.
Ask us directly
Questions about your workflow, stack, or compliance scope.
Email lets-talk@mactores.com
Is Your AI Agent Pilot Stuck Before Production?
Get a fixed date and a fixed fee for the agent your board keeps asking about.
-
01
Bring one workflow to a working session with our FDEs.
-
02
Get a go or no-go, a scope, and a production date within five business days.
-
03
Sign a fixed-fee SOW and start the assessment phase.
Every engagement carries a 30-day satisfaction guarantee and a 90-day warranty on production defects.






